'Yoon Hyung-keun' 2018

'Yoon Hyung-keun' 2018

 In fact, I didn't know much about the painter or his work when I first encountered the exhibit. When I first saw the artist’s work, it was like watching a 'Tetris game'. The combination of lines and sides that didn't know the meaning seemed ambiguous, and the tone of the work was also murky, making it difficult to know what the message was in it. Actually, it wasn't my favorite painting style, so I just looked around the showroom and came out early. By the way, the curator's time once a day approached and I went back to the exhibition hall when she asked me to listen. I realized that I had taken the display of his life too lightly. Yoon Hyung-keun is said to be the highest-rated korean artist in the art market these days. I remember the curator saying that maybe he is much more famous abroad than he is in our country.

 In fact, rather than seeing his first work, the painter's life story, the resulting changes in work and color, were more impressive. Work has come a long way since I heard such stories. There are many stories to tell, such as the historical background and stories about his teacher, but this report seems more appropriate to write down what I felt. One of the most impressive aspects of the writer's work was that while the author insisted on only one path or work style, there were times when he changed his work style innovatively. Of course, the background is based not only on one's will but also on historical background and flow. He had a wide deal of ups and downs in life.

 There is a saying that 'emulation is the mother of creation.' As a matter of fact, I thought, "Is this sentence correct?" as a major in art? At any rate, imitation is a copycat and there were many questions as to whether it could be the mother of creation. Copying someone else's work was basically just copying them, and I wondered how it could be considered a new creation. But that was just my little idea. His work, which learned the art of pioneering, brought in a similar color, and then worked on his new work, moved in a new art way in a different direction from his teacher. Through Yoon's exhibition, he realized the importance of teachers. Following his teacher, Kim Han-ki, he initially worked hard on colors that used a lot of 'ventilation blue.' Following his teacher, his early work style was chosen, and he later built new areas based on it and opened his own art style.

 The distinctive features of his work are color and texture. In fact, if you look at the exhibition, very dark colored paintings are the most important parts. Anyone can feel the heavy, dark emotions that the writer feels inside without hearing about his life or other details. Although there is relatively little information about art, docent asked a child who is more emotional than anyone else about his works. Then the children didn't listen to the subject, and everyone felt intuitive about how he felt and how his works were produced.

  It was not necessary to know that brush strokes represent tears or that black colors represent his dark heart, but to feel it right away. In fact, I didn't like docent asking children, "What is this picture?" I think art can be interpreted differently to someone, and there is no answer. In particular, I thought that children should develop creativity and have their own art views, but I thought it was wrong to answer them correctly and tell them whether they fit in or not. But it would be great for an artist to know exactly what he intended. It would be proof that he was a great artist that allowed viewers to feel what he wanted to express and express through his work.

 Isn't learning about lighting and photography in our photography world also a way to learn about teacher skills and work and develop him into his own? These days, I am really worried about what to do and I am going to get rid of it through this exhibition. Not only did I have to create my own new thing, but I thought learning based on the work and work of the artists I already have, and creating my new territory would also be a good way to set the subject and do my own work. Rather than agonizing over something new and innovative, I should think about ways to develop what I already have and to add my own color.

 What the exhibition also felt was the importance of 'curating'. Actually, as I said earlier, when I first saw the painter's work, I didn't find it as very interesting. There was a lot of detail in the State Department, such as the planning of the exhibition, naming, and the theme of the exhibition. The most memorable anecdote was that the exhibition's name itself was 'Yoon Hyung-keun' without subtitling, which was very unusual and great for the National Museum of Contemporary Art. It's usually an exhibition of the artist's work or ideas on a subject, but this exhibition is about artist Yoon Hyung-geun himself.
Listening to these stories was very attractive.

 Also, the display inside the exhibition hall was very good. The curator said he intentionally reduced the number of works for space design. Because it is a general exhibition of his life, he initially planned to encourage planners to hang on to a lot of work, but as his plans gradually become clearer, he wanted to give them a sense of deep insight into his life. Each part has its own display and space design. In fact, when I first saw this exhibition, I thought the space was very simple, but it was well-positioned. The size of the artwork is large, so if there wasn't enough space, the grandeur of the exhibition would have been less likely. I felt once more that layout and design of space were also very important in the exhibition. I especially felt after watching graduation exhibitions that I saw these days, but I thought that a good sense of space was an important element of a good exhibition.

 In fact, I usually went to the photo exhibition. As it was my field of art, I went to see many exhibitions by photographers. It was the first time I saw an art artist's private exhibition, especially, but it was a very helpful exhibition to me because I think that the genre mix is also an important part of art. From now on, I will not stick to exhibition of photographs but go to exhibitions in various fields such as art and music and develop my work through them.

Is it tomorrow yet?

  Daelim Museum is now presenting ‘Is It Tomorrow Yet?’, the first solo exhibition in Asia by the 'Young Art Star', Coco Capitán, whose work has drawn international recognition. Running from August 2, 2018 to January 27, 2019, the exhibition features over

150 artworks in a wide range of media including photography, painting, handwriting, video, and installation.

 I knew some works of her, but didn’t know what kind of artist she is. Coco Capitorn (born in 1992 in Spain) is a photographer and artist based in London. 

She majored in fashion photography at London College of Fashion and graduated from Royal College of Art. The author presents photos, paintings, murals, hand lighting, images, installations with his unique frankness and freedom.

 The exhibition sheds a light on the various aspects of Capitán's works from paintings to handwritings and photography to installations, reflecting on 

the conflict of her emotions with the present which she perceives as becoming increasingly crowded and noisy. Capitán consciously guides us to slow 

down, to live for a now - not for a tomorrow or a then - and look at what lies in front of us

It was a fancy exhibition. 

  I liked her photographs and design works also. All around the museum, striking artworks were displayed. I saw a clip interview of her defining herself as an ‘artist’. She said that she is an artist, not a photographer or film maker. I think she wants people remember her as a well- equipped artistic person. She seems proud of her self that she is a versatile artist. I agree with that, but the exhibition was only showing those kinds of things. I felt like being noticed “I can do this, this, and that. Isn’t it fancy?” 

consolation?

  The main theme of the exhibition was coco’s consolation to others. But I think it has failed

to give people that kind of message. Only thing I remember after watching the exhibition was the colorful artworks of her, not healing or comfort from her. I think it was hard to being cured or cheer up after watching that exhibition. I don’t understand the ‘consolation’ as a theme, it looked like contrived and unnatural to me. It doesn’t fit to the exhibition.  

  Not only about the theme, but also the worst point of this exhibition was that there were too many people in the museum. Also, almost all people were taking pictures with their phones, I could not concentrate on the artworks. It was a loud, fancy exhibition. To be a better place as a artistic museum, I think Daelim should make some rules to make more quite place that people can get a real ‘consolation’. 

Korea Artist Prize 2018

'Korea Artist Prize'

올해의 작가상  

I visited the ‘Korea Artist Prize 2018’ which is now being exhibited in Seoul MMCA. 

 Organized and presented since 2002 by National Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art, Korea and SBS foundation, ‘Korea artist Prize’(KAP) is a program whose object is to provide support in terms of exhibition space, finances, and exposure to the domestic and foreign art professionals and the general public. 

 Each year, the main themes of the prize are different. For this year, the question shared by this year’s artists is “Are the conditions, thoughts that are surrounding us innately given or merely learned?” Here are showcased the recent works of these four participants who look into the social issues that they come across. 

This time Minja GU, Run young Jung, Okin Collective, Jaeho Jung were the artists.  

 It was my third time to see the ‘KAP’ and I think 2018 was the best among them for me. It might be because I have grown up, or my interest to the artwork has been deeper, I really liked the works of this year’s artists. Especially, Minja Gu and Jae Ho Jung’s works were very impressive to me. 

 ‘Island of the day before’ 

 Among the works, Minja Gu’s work ‘Island of the day before’ was the most impressive to me. In this artwork, which is a video work, If one spends a day in the west and the next he or she live a day in the east, then he or she loses a day in her entire life. So through this performance, Minja Gu lived a same date twice. And for her friend Soo jung Choi, one day was deleted in her life.

Here, the artist poses the question, “Can one live one day twice?” and look into the irreversibility of time’s passage and the meaning of life. She constantly inquires into the possibility that much of what one believes as true might be man-made and that quite the opposite can be regarded as truth in another culture.

So, the artist ‘Mina Gu’ is answering ‘the question’ of the exhibition’s theme through her perspective and by the source of ‘time’. She didn’t think the time, which is the most common thing that has given to us, as a innately given thing. She concerned about the definition of time, and the man-made civilization.   

 Like Gu did, the four artists really expressed their own thinking about the ‘question’: “Are the conditions, thoughts that are surrounding us innately given or merely learned?” through their works. Very different characters of the artworks make us more concentrate and joyful. The single works were all good and artistic, but for me, appreciating the point of views of individual artists was most interesting. 

 Surprisingly, I didn’t know exactly how this exhibition has been run. I just thought this exhibition is just an assembly of Korean contemporary artists’ works which were chosen by the MMCA. But, it was rather a residency program than an artistic competition. Course, since only one artist is selected as the artist of this year, we could not say that it is not competitive, I came to know that this is more like a cooperation group exhibition. I really liked the point that they are sharing the same theme and question for the exhibition by their own perspectives and art expressions.  

 To be honest, before attending this class and writing this kind of review statement, I didn’t look the information of the exhibition or the guide information of the museum with care. I was just looking at the artworks, thinking about the artist’s skills and concentrated in external elements. From now on, I will try to ‘know’ well, and feel well. As professor said in the field trip, feeling is as important as knowing about the work, I will do the both thing while looking around exhibitions. 

 MMCA Seoul is one of my best museums. I feel great and being refreshed when I go there. The interior is fancy and the area is large enough to concentrate on the artworks. Also, you can be free of the noisy shutter sound. Most interesting element of exhibition was that I could pick one artist for the artist of the year. I recommend you the exhibition that is being held in the best museum.

Who is (or was) your artist of the year?